Commons:Administrators/Requests/Bedivere 2
-
Support = 21; 
Oppose = 2; 
Neutral = 0 - 91% Result. Successful. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Bedivere
Bedivere (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth) (Activity: Talk Commons DR)
- Scheduled to end: 22:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello again! It's been a year since my last request for adminship. I took those comments and votes at heart and have tried my best, with the limited time I have, to contribute more and more to this project. I have been an active participant in Commons for nearly four years, and have contributed especially in regards to copyright issues, participating for example tagging copyvios, in discussions for deletion, and general maintenance tasks. I believe my dedication and commitment to the platform's core principles are unwavering. I have created a more comprehensive local user page (in response to one of the older RFA comments), reflecting my sincere dedication to contributing meaningfully to this community. I am committed to continually educating myself on copyright matters, as I am currently a law student. If entrusted with adminship, I pledge to utilize my skills and experience to address the backlog of deletion requests, combat copyright violations, and provide assistance to fellow users. Additionally, my proficiency in Spanish positions me to better support speakers of that language. I humbly request your support and vote of confidence in this endeavor. I am steadfast in my commitment to learning and growing alongside our community. I appreciate all comments and questions, and I am looking forward to respond to each one! Thanks in advance. Bedivere (talk) 22:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Votes
- Support Killarnee (talk) 02:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Can be trusted with the tool. Thank you for volunteering.FitIndia Semi-retired 05:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support, familiarity with the law and a great asset since being a law student. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support I haven't dealt with Bedivere much myself, but they seem to be knowledgeable and well behaved. Plus them being from South America would clearly be an asset to the project if they were an administrator. So I see no reason not to support them. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sure! Yann (talk) 10:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose.--RZuo (talk) 11:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- @RZuo: Could you please elaborate why you oppose this candidature? Yann (talk) 12:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Could you please explain, why ypou did not ask those who give a pro (inclouding yourself), why they do it? Something like that is really bad form because it ends up discouraging people from voting freely if they have to face having to explain themselves. This reminds me of my early years in the GDR. Where elections were never free. Marcus Cyron (talk) 02:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Marcus Cyron: ”A discussion takes place [...] Editors state if they support or oppose the request, along with their reasons and impressions of the candidate.“ and ”[...] the closing bureaucrat has discretion in judging community consensus, and the decision will not necessarily be based on the raw numbers. [...] the closing bureaucrat may take into account the strength of any arguments presented and the experience and knowledge of the commenting users.“ There are wikis where unfortunately RfA's are handled other than like here and only based on hard numbers. In addition, RZuo has often caught my eye by opposing without comment, Yann's comment is not entirely without justification. Killarnee (talk) 03:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- There is near-unanimity, so a simple "no" vote is going to have no effect. A reasoned argument against might matter.- Jmabel ! talk 19:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Could you please explain, why ypou did not ask those who give a pro (inclouding yourself), why they do it? Something like that is really bad form because it ends up discouraging people from voting freely if they have to face having to explain themselves. This reminds me of my early years in the GDR. Where elections were never free. Marcus Cyron (talk) 02:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- @RZuo: Could you please elaborate why you oppose this candidature? Yann (talk) 12:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Why not? --SHB2000 (talk) 11:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Bedivere would be a good sysop, and is very knowledgeable about Chile. Abzeronow (talk) 18:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Althair Talk 18:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support. -- Geagea (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Natuur12 (talk) 14:04, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Of course. ─ Aafī (talk) 07:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good track record, no issues on sight. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 13:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support No concerns. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 18:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Has shown improvement since the last RfA. Keep the promise of Taivo "Next year you will pass". --A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Low edit count, otherwise a good candidate. 20 upper 08:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support A strong record. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 15:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC).
- Support Seems ready for it, and I don't see any real negatives. - Jmabel ! talk 19:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 08:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -sasha- (talk) 17:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support. —— Eric Liu（Talk） 13:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)